One premises having many schools

---

Having many schools within a single premises, or on the same grounds, can lead to overcrowding, reduced access to resources, and a potential for increased competition or conflict between schools and students. It also limits the ability of each school to develop its unique identity and character, potentially hindering educational outcomes.

@BEGUM0167087d15
You're absolutely right having multiple schools within a single premises can create significant challenges. Overcrowding often leads to limited classroom space, shared facilities, and strained resources like libraries, labs, and playgrounds. This not only affects the quality of teaching and learning but also the overall student well-being.

Moreover, when schools operate in close proximity, it can lead to unnecessary competition or conflict, especially among students during shared activities or break times. It may also dilute each school's individual identity, making it harder for staff and students to build a strong sense of community and pride in their institution.

To address this, authorities should consider better infrastructure planning, scheduled facility sharing, and clear boundaries between schools—both physical and administrative. It's important that each school is allowed space to grow, innovate, and nurture its own culture for better educational outcomes.

@Shaista-Begum
I think having multiple schools within a single premises can be challenging. While it might seem efficient, it can lead to overcrowding, resource constraints, and unhealthy competition among students. Each school should have its own distinct identity, culture, and resources to foster a unique learning environment. This setup can also make it difficult for schools to develop their own strengths and specializations. Instead, I'd suggest having separate, self-contained schools that can cater to their students' specific needs, promote a sense of community, and allow for more focused educational approaches. This would likely lead to better educational outcomes and a more positive learning experience for students.

@Shaista-Begum
As a teacher, I think having multiple schools sharing the same premises or building can be really challenging. It can lead to overcrowding, noise pollution, and limited access to resources like libraries, labs, and playgrounds. This setup can also foster unhealthy competition among students and teachers, potentially affecting their mental well-being and academic performance. Moreover, it can be difficult for each school to establish its own unique identity and culture. In Pakistan,in our province where many schools share buildings, it can be particularly tough for students and teachers to cope with the chaos and limitations. In my opinion, It might be beneficial to consider separate, well-resourced facilities for each school to ensure a better learning environment and overall educational experience.

@Mariya Sharing a building can reduce construction and operational costs for multiple schools.

@Zymal492cb0cdb1 Shared spaces and schedules can create confusion and potential conflicts between different schools and their students.

@Zymal492cb0cdb1 The shared nature of the facilities can sometimes disrupt the established routines and community feel of individual schools.

@Shaista-Begum Absolutely agree. When multiple schools share the same premises, it can strain facilities like libraries, playgrounds, and labs. This setup often creates noise, scheduling conflicts, and limited space, which can negatively affect student focus and school culture. Each school deserves the space to grow with its own values and learning environment.

@Sanaa said in One premises having many schools:

@Shaista-Begum Absolutely agree. When multiple schools share the same premises, it can strain facilities like libraries, playgrounds, and labs. This setup often creates noise, scheduling conflicts, and limited space, which can negatively affect student focus and school culture. Each school deserves the space to grow with its own values and learning environment.

Agreed

@Sanaa Scheduling conflicts.

Resource allocation disputes.

Noise and overcrowding.

Administrative complexity.

"Although we cannot alter what is inherent or fundamental in our circle, we can respond to it effectively by applying our different ways of
skills and strategies to grow and succeed.

@Shaista-Begum ideally speaking it may be right. But in a state short of funds and resources, such as ours, especially in education, I think one premise institutions can be better choice given the need of the hour. It saves costs. Positive competition can help schools build better systems. Shared facilities can nurture mutual cooperation and support. So there are many benefits. Once state becomes self sufficient or surplus in budget allocation than we can emphasise seperate infrastructures.