Inspectors come with a fixed mindset ("This is a weak school," "This teacher is always poor").
Judgments are made before seeing actual classroom or student performance.
- Favoritism or Personal Relations
Giving better feedback to schools where the inspector has friends, relatives, or past links.
Ignoring flaws in one school and highlighting minor issues in another.
- Acceptance of Gifts or Hospitality
Accepting gifts, meals, or favors creates moral obligation or conflict of interest.
This makes it hard to give honest and critical feedback.
- Focusing Only on Certain Areas
Ignoring holistic development: judging only test scores but ignoring creativity, environment, or student behavior.
Focusing too much on documents and not on real teaching and learning.
- Personal Likes/Dislikes
Bias based on teacher’s tone, dress, gender, religion, or language.
Using personal opinions rather than set standards or inspection tools.
- Pressure from Authorities
Changing the report under political or administrative pressure.
Writing positive reports to please higher officials instead of reflecting the ground reality.
- Inconsistent Standards
Expecting high standards from one school but low expectations from another.
Not using the same checklist or evaluation method for all schools.
- Not Listening to Multiple Voices
Ignoring feedback from students, parents, or junior staff.
Judging a school only based on what the principal or one teacher says.
Effects of Biased Inspection
Demoralizes sincere teachers and leaders.
Promotes favoritism and corruption.
Damages trust in the education system.
Misguides school improvement efforts.
How to Avoid Bias in Inspection
Use standardized checklists.
Observe multiple classes and activities, not just one.
Listen to different stakeholders (students, teachers, parents).
Maintain professional distance—no gifts, favors, or influence.
Focus on facts and evidence, not personal impressions.