Rethinking Assessment: Are Traditional Exams Failing Inclusive Learners?

---

@SALMAN They may not consider a student's prior knowledge, experiences, or the specific learning environment.

@SALMAN They may not adequately assess higher-level skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration, which are increasingly important in today's world.

@SALMAN Standardized tests can be stressful and anxiety-inducing, particularly for students with learning differences or those who perform better under different assessment conditions.

@SALMAN Traditional assessments can inadvertently exclude students with disabilities or those who learn in non-traditional ways.

@SALMAN Incorporating real-world tasks and projects that allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in practical ways.

@SALMAN Utilizing a variety of assessment methods, such as presentations, portfolios, performance tasks, and peer assessments, to provide a more comprehensive picture of student learning.

@SALMAN Developing personalized profiles that capture a student's strengths, learning preferences, and areas for growth, rather than relying solely on standardized scores.

@SALMAN Ensuring that all assessment materials and procedures are accessible and equitable for all students, including those with disabilities or language barriers.

@SALMAN Traditional exams, especially those heavily reliant on written or timed formats, can be inaccessible to students with disabilities such as learning disabilities, physical impairments, or sensory processing differences.

@SALMAN Students come from diverse backgrounds with varying levels of prior knowledge and learning experiences. Traditional exams often fail to account for these differences, creating an uneven playing field.